Esercizio di traduzione elementary in inglese • 80

Switch on your English - elementary

La traduzione, come metodo di esercizio nell’apprendimento di una lingua, farà sicuramente parte della vecchia scuola, però, inserita in un contesto più vario di apprendimento, soprattutto con feedback in tempo reale, può sempre essere un utile esercizio di allenamento.

Consiglio una partecipazione attiva e visibile, postando la tua versione tra i commenti in fondo a questa pagina. In questo modo riceverai un mio commento o suggerimento in tempo più o meno reale. Ma per chi non se la sente, si può semplicemente annotare la propria versione e controllarla attraverso i miei commenti lasciati per gli altri.

Ricorda l’importanza di immaginare un contesto reale nel quale la frase in questione avrebbe senso, prima di procedere con la traduzione.

Per chi transita tra il livello A2 e il livello B1

Ecco la nuova frase:

Se non riesci a vedere nulla su questo schermo quando spengo la luce, non devi fare altro che  premere questo pulsante e sarò subito da te.

Buon divertimento!
Unknown's avatar

Author: Tony

Born and raised in Malaysia between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore. Educated at Wycliffe College in Stonehouse, Gloucestershire, England. Living in the foothills of Mount Etna since 1982 and teaching English at Catania University since 1987.

19 thoughts on “Esercizio di traduzione elementary in inglese • 80”

  1. Hi Tony, can you correct my version? I know I’m not so practice in this type of exercise….
    If you can’t see anything on this screen when I turni off the light, you will push (I used the future, because it’s the first conditional’s structure) this botton and I will come to you.

    1. Hi Elena, that’s a very good effort on your part.
      Remember with the first conditional that the future can be replaced with an imperative or with a modal verb in the present. In this case the future is not present but it is understood by the context. In this case, assuming that you are not familiar with the expression “non devi fare altro che”, the simplest alternative is to use an imperative with “just”: “just push this button”. The future in the last part (and I will come to you) is correct, but it would be a bit more natural to say something like, “I’ll be right back” or “I’ll come straight back to you.”
      🙂

      1. Ahh thanks so much!!! So, the correct version on my phrase Is: “If you can’t see anything on this screen when I turn off the light, you just push this botton and I’ll be righ back”, isn’t It?

  2. If you can’t see anything on this screen when I switch off the light, you have nothing else to do except to push this button and I’ll be back to you at once /immediately/

    1. Hi Carla.
      The first part is great, but I’m afraid you can’t say “You have nothing else to do” as it gives the sense of “Non hai nient’altro da fare (cioè sei sfaccendato)”. What you need here is the classic “All you have to do is…”
      “I’ll be back to you at once” is okay but “I’ll get back to you at once” would be better if you want a dynamic feel.
      Otherwise you could just say, “I’ll be right with you” or “I’ll be right back.”
      🙂

  3. Hi there
    If you can’t see anything on this screen when I turn the light off, you just have to push this button and I will be with you immediately.

  4. Se non riesci a vedere nulla su questo schermo quando spengo la luce, non devi fare altro che premere questo pulsante e sarò subito da te.

    If you can’t see anything on this screen when I switch off the light, all you have to do is to push this button and I’ll be right with you.

  5. If you can’t see anything when I turn the light off, all you have to do is press this button and I’ll be right back.

    Thank you!

  6. Ciao!
    If you can’t see anything on this screen when I turn off the light, all you have to do is press this button and I’ll be right to you.

    1. Hi Davide!
      It’s always prepositions! The rest is perfect.
      “I’ll be right with you.”
      🙂

        1. “Run” is a dynamic verb → ‘verso’ you (destination)
          “Be” is a static verb → sarò “con” te.
          I can understand the mistake because you felt that although “be” is static” there is an implied movement, right? It’s true, but unfortunately in this case, it doesn’t work.
          It DOES work in expressions like, “Have you ever been TO China?”
          🙂

  7. 80
    Se non riesci a vedere nulla su questo schermo quando spengo la luce, non devi fare altro che  premere questo pulsante e sarò subito da te.

    If you can’t see anything on this screen when you switch off the light, all you have to do is press this button and I’ll be right with you.

    1. Very good, Claudio!
      You’ve got the wrong subject for “spegnere” (spengo), but I think I can overlook it as the rest of the sentence is very well structured. 😉

Lascia un commento

Discover more from Ingliando

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading